Then there are other strategies that start off out by essentially touching the lands w/ the start load. Looks as if the above and H335 may lead to the perfect storm.

My expertise with CFE223 is basically very good velocity for the given load when compared with other powders, but mediocre accuracy.

If on the lookout to obtain an automatic powder-charge dispensing device to speed up precision reloading, You should not judge the RCBS ChargeMaster Lite powder scale and dispenser by its name; the Very little Eco-friendly machine packs a major-weight punch with pace and accuracy.

Quoted: H-335 is actually a vintage .223 Rem powder and was oft proposed by ballistician Ed Matunas who did many reloading manuals to be a powder that shot properly in a variety of rifles.  At first a armed forces surplus powder, it is now freshly-created for Hodgdon.   Moreover, since it is really a ball powder, it meters a lot better than extensive-grain IMR 3031.

I did make up a dozen or so dummy cartridges to examine performing in both equally a AR along with a Mini-14, so I cycled them in the Howa and so they loaded no dilemma, I did not have to have any power for them to chamber.

Ought to I give absent the power to the buddy that might get some first rate use outside of it, or keep on to it in case I get Yet another gun that might do nicely with it?

Add to quote Only demonstrate this user #twelve · Dec nine, 2015 I made use of some back again Once i couldn't uncover/get W748 in my 17Rem and it killed loads of foxes for me. Haven't received my loading documents right here with me so can't give a load.

I have browse wonderful factors about tac even though. I've examine It truly is better for lighter bullets? What's your man's load data for tac along with the 55gr'er. Thanks and sorry, I sense like I publish a whole lot here lol You're MY ONLY Mates

A few of the accompanying highest loads create pressures that exceed most (but not all) factory loads; nonetheless, They may be within market maximum normal stress pointers. When these loads worked flawlessly during the Ruger Hawkeye, They could give some leverguns, including the Savage Model ninety nine, Winchester Model 88, some Browning BLR variants and pump-motion Remington Types 760 and 7600 some troubles.

two grains rather than exceed 3100 fps. The results posted inside the guide for a longer barrel do produce higher values, nonetheless it would appear that the value with the NATO ammunition in that barrel would yield even higher values.

Spherical powders need to have that additional shot within the magnum for trustworthy ignition, not less than that is the theory. I've generally employed 400's in all my guns, including with my ARs and have never experienced a challenge possibly.

Posts: three,881 I have the data in my reloading manual, I was just inquiring if everyone had compared each powders. Like I said I cannot seem to get H335 to shoot as exact and CFE223.   rebs

Quoted: H-335 is often a common .223 Rem powder and was oft advisable by ballistician Ed Matunas who did numerous reloading manuals as being a powder that shot properly in many different rifles.  At first a military services surplus powder, it is now freshly-made for Hodgdon.   Moreover, since it is often a ball powder, it meters significantly better than prolonged-grain IMR 3031.

My Favored accurate load for 223 is H322 with 55gr V-max Or BIB bullets if I'm genuinely seeking to shoot. I love the way CFE223 meters and shoots very properly but H322 is more exact for me.